"The? of? of? music everyone listens to music today. ? there anything surprising in that? If we look back in time, vederemo that was not always so?. The music then was that? of? of? music not good music-bad music, music videos, classic-rock, this music and the music. The music can? just be? of? of? music n? No good? il? of defective? of? l anything else? ?,? non-music. The music in the past was not only a form of entertainment but something more?. Moreover, only a few used to listen to music, as was the case with all art. There were few pretences in this regard and had not the means of achieving fame or success. It was life for some, means of worship for any and had no means of great expression, beyond words and images. The tone, sound used, the instruments were all half staff so that much? the musician reach in s? and go beyond it? of that? of? I said to my friend Jitendra, one day after listening Bach.It had been a year since I started taking music seriously and I found great pleasure in doing so. Pi? Soon, everyone had to listen usassi some music of Hindi film and any ultimate pop music in Hindi and English pi? People. It was always media entertainment for me, means to pass the time, to have some activity? while in the background was something in the way that? t of? of didn? I obtain ales. The first I had never really paid attention. Jitendra said,? of? of? like all the other arts, music? decreased during the nearly 30 years. The music now? been linked with images, ideas and entertainment, partying and everything else. Most of the so-called music now? nothing but empty sounds, a lot of people by using all kinds of artificial means to handle the sounds to achieve popularity? of? of? of? dell'estremit?. What? What popular music?. Moreover, a division? been generated, probably based on? exterior? of? shape between classical and popular music. But if one listens, really listens to what you hear? only music. If one simply listens, without comparing what you hear his idea of music, only then can one? see that? of? Music is. I was new in Mumbai and Jitendra was here, what? usually my only friend on weekends and whenever I had a day off, me? His place went to stay above. It was an old friend of mine, from the time when I was in Delhi. We used to stay together in a hostel for payment by the guest. Our rooms were close neighbor and we used often spend time together. I said,? of? of? in India, only classical forms of music have survived, probably because? ? was not popular and most of its representatives did not succumb to the pleas of ambition or personal fame. Nell'ovest, anyway? the case with classical music, bench? l? quality? depended on the dell'esecutore or conductor. In popular music, several good attempts have been made in the rock, and punk in jazz during the years before the 80s. Since then, we? been a gradual decline in popular music. In India, Bollywood music, except in some cases? been melodramatic, sensational and mediocre. The decades of 60s and 70s were especially productive for music in many ways the? of? of? l? was a regeneration, a break from traditional forms, but soon after,? sprofondato? of? of again. I was discovering that I become ever more? intimate with music lately. I saw the beauty, the importance of music as part of human existence. Initially, I used to resist anything new, because? gi? not? been known to me. I used to be satisfied with what was used because? gave me a certain degree of comodit?. Now I was aware how small my world was and how extensive were the unexplored territories. The music was what helped me realize this pi? of anything else. I started listening to it openly, again, without any expectations and I found that listening without an idea, I could hear what? well. The music was how to teach that? t of? Can? of? of a? to listen. define that music? ? of? of? All attempts to define music physically is not enough. It must feel, with the senses free, untainted by expectation or comparison to see the beauty of music,? of that? of? he said, as if reading my thoughts. music? of? of? always takes place long ago. If you really listen carefully, l? sar? sense of time. ? this quality? Music that has made so many great composers exalt as virt? divine. The music has an effect on the body and? of? of? mentally not as two distinct effects but as a total effect. The direction interessa various senses, and when one? in harmony with the music, and then ceases to be something separate, something outside of himself? of that? of? there transformed into music. The music? harmony and music? beauty. The music has the quality? expression of the inexpressible. A method of music? t of? Can? with? s? of one? has the similar or the avversioni and tastes, which are all a part of? s? of one? have air conditioning. The music? something extraordinary both complex and simple at the same time. We're not used to listen to anything except our own thoughts, then the sense of us? t of? Can? the beauty of music. As they? we are always trying to do things according to our own particular tastes and Gradica avversioni and we have developed, we become deaf to all other sounds. But when we fall everything and simply listen, and then becomes a sound? of? of? what the pi? the marvelous complexity? it, the depth, clarity, penetration, the opening of many doors that lead to? inexpressible and beyond? of? of words. how could put everything into words! Things that I was weak and realized that they were not so? free to me became clear as the light sull'udito him. The extract above the ____________________________________________________________________________The? been taken from the story, music and dall'intelligenza, described in the book – to think or not think and other stories, by Ashutosh Ghildiyal

Ashutosh Ghildiyal